Maryland Personal Injury Attorney Jonathan Carroll represented a client who was rear-ended. The responsible party claimed that Mr. Carroll’s client backed into him while he was stopped. During the course of the trial, Mr. Carroll forced the responsible party to admit that after the accident when the two drivers spoke, the responsible party did not obtain an address or insurance information from the person he claimed had just backed into him. The Court found in favor of Mr. Carroll’s client on the basis that the responsible party could not have believed Mr. Carroll’s client was at fault. If the responsible party thought Mr. Carroll’s client had actually been at fault, he would have obtained his address and insurance information. There were no eye witnesses to this accident.
- Home
- Attorneys
- Attorney Andrew V. Jezic
- Attorney Ahmet Hisim
- Attorney David H. Moyse
- Attorney Rand W. Lucey
- Attorney Amal A. Bertrand
- Attorney Bruce Godfrey
- Attorney Jonathan Carroll
- Attorney Robert Grabo
- Attorney Robert J. Hendricks
- Attorney Clifford Clapp
- Attorney David Wooten
- Attorney Himedes V. Chicas
- Attorney Diana Pak Yi
- Attorney Carolyn Demougeot
- Attorney Jamie Alvarado-Taylor
- Criminal
- Immigration
- Traffic
- Employment
- Family
- Personal Injury
- Workers Comp
- Medical Malpractice
- Blog
- More

Leave a Reply